Reading the runes on a Warsh Fed - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
专栏 凯文•沃什

Reading the runes on a Warsh Fed

The presumptive next chair might be better than others on the list, but he is a confusing, perhaps confused, figure
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.19,"text":"If confirmed as chair of the Federal Reserve, is Kevin Warsh going to be an inflation hawk or Donald Trump’s poodle? His repeated statements on monetary policy and the broader obligations of the Fed suggest the former. But his more recent statements on the inflation outlook and the fact that Trump chose him very much suggest the latter. More broadly, is he a man of conviction and judgment or is he a weathervane, blowing with the wind from the Republican side of politics and so in favour of loose monetary policy when Republicans are in power and of tight money when the Democrats are?"}],[{"start":47.54,"text":"Warsh’s words indicate that he is very much the “hard money” central banker. Notably, in a speech to the Shadow Open Market Committee in New York given in March 2010, when the US economy was, remember, still struggling with the deeply recessionary aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, he had already started worrying about Fed credibility."}],[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":71.62,"text":"He made four main points. First, Fed independence applies only to monetary policy, not “regulatory policy, consumer protection or other responsibilities granted to the Federal Reserve”. Second, the “Fed, as first-responder, must strongly resist the temptation to be the ultimate rescuer”. Third, “governments may be tempted to influence the central bank to keep monetary policy looser longer to finance the debt and stimulate activity”. But the “only popularity central bankers should seek, if at all, is in the history books”. Last, “central banks, here and abroad, have worked for decades to get inflation down to levels consistent with price stability. We should not risk these hard-won gains.”"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":118.95,"text":"Intellectually, at least, today’s Warsh appears the same as the one of 2010. In his IMF lecture delivered in April 2025, he stressed not only the Fed’s “institutional drift”, but also its recent “failure to satisfy an essential part of its statutory remit, price stability. It has also contributed to an explosion of federal spending. And the Fed’s outsized role and underperformance have weakened the important and worthy case for monetary policy independence.” He made other criticisms, the most pointed being that “the Fed has been the most important buyer of US Treasury debt — and other liabilities backed by the US government — since 2008”. He asserts: “Fiscal dominance — where the nation’s debts constrain monetary policymakers — was long thought by economists to be a possible end-state. My view is that monetary dominance — where the central bank becomes the ultimate arbiter of fiscal policy — is the clearer and more present danger.” For Warsh, then, easy money is the road to ruin."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":187.13,"text":"So what has persuaded Trump, who is fiscal dominance incarnate, and has been berating poor Jay Powell as a “jerk” for not cutting interest rates faster, to appoint Warsh chair, apart maybe from his good looks? One reason might be that he likes Warsh’s hostility to the Fed’s “woke” over-reach. Another might be that he likes his inclination towards financial deregulation. Yet another might be that he is a relatively orthodox choice, whose appointment should calm nervous markets (as it has, so far). But a crucial point must be that Warsh has conveniently concluded that inflation is no longer a threat, because of technology-fuelled productivity growth. That might even be right. As Warsh notes, Alan Greenspan made a similar bet about the impact of the internet in the 1990s. But it is a bold leap for a man who feared inflation back in 2010, in the midst of a deep slump. If he got his way, he would be replacing the “data-dependency” of the Fed with a hunch. Given the huge US fiscal deficits and debts and the US economy’s fast growth, that would be a big gamble."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Column chart of US government balance as a % of GDP showing US federal deficits are still very high as a share of GDP
"}],[{"start":256.66999999999996,"text":"How then might the choice of Warsh play out? I actually agree with some of Warsh’s criticisms of the Fed, notably over its drift into areas that are not part of its core functions. I agree, too, that the post-pandemic inflation was in part its fault: together with other central banks, it failed even to consider that the jump in the money supply in 2020 might lead to a jump in the price level. I also agree with Warsh that the backward-looking monetary policy framework introduced in 2020 was a conceptual and practical error (not to mention grossly mistimed)."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Line chart of Federal Reserve assets, as % of GDP showing The Fed’s balance sheet has already fallen a long way from its peak
"}],[{"start":296.4,"text":"It is comforting, too, to note that the Fed is an institution. The Fed is far more than the chair. Its leadership matters hugely. But Warsh would be unable to ride roughshod over other members of the Federal Open Market Committee or even its staff, at least in the short run."}],[{"start":316.83,"text":"Yet worries remain, on two fronts. The first is that Warsh might be far too willing to argue for whatever Trump wants, even though this would mean accepting fiscal dominance, in spades. It also appears that he intends to justify doing so by offsetting lower short-term rates with higher longer-term ones, as the Fed’s balance sheet is aggressively shrunk. At the same time, the US Treasury is likely to shift further towards short-term financing. With a more strongly upward-sloping US yield curve, the likely outcome would be greater demand for dollar financing at the short end, and less demand at the long end. Above all, given the decline in banks’ reserves and financial deregulation as well, the balance sheets of the financial sector would become more fragile. The incentive to hold the dollar might also fall, as short rates decline and fear of inflation jumps. The result might be another financial crisis."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Column chart of Federal debt as % of GDP, by holder showing US federal debt is back to 1946 levels relative to GDP
"}],[{"start":372.72999999999996,"text":"Yes, Warsh is a better candidate than many of the others on the list. But he is a confusing, perhaps confused, figure. The US and the world need a Fed chair who will stand up to Trump. To his credit, Powell has proved himself to be such a man. Will Warsh?"}],[{"start":401.12999999999994,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1770366503_4639.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

乌克兰军火商加码卫星布局,以减少对美依赖

在开发无人机和导弹之后,Fire Point正进军太空领域,尽管公司仍因涉嫌腐败接受调查。

囤积行为加剧伊朗战争引发的经济损害

随着霍尔木兹海峡的对峙进入第三个月,全球各国政府都在艰难应对同一个难题:如何防止囤积者加剧从汽油到注射器等各类产品的短缺。

FT社评:伊朗战争让各国央行进退两难

如果各国央行过早通过加息来遏制通胀压力,可能令本已受创的经济雪上加霜;如但果按兵不动、观望冲突的进展,又可能贻误时机。

反弹的通胀与不耐烦的特朗普:凯文•沃什面临双重压力

美国参议院本周有望批准这位56岁的金融家接替杰伊•鲍威尔出任美联储主席。

伊朗战争推高燃气价格,印度工人纷纷逃离城市生活

伊朗战争推高了烹饪燃料价格,迫使印度许多务工人员返乡回村。

能源、军火与粮食:特朗普对伊战争日益沉重的代价

这场冲突正波及整个美国经济,造成了数千亿美元的产出损失。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×