EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

反弹的通胀与不耐烦的特朗普:凯文•沃什面临双重压力

美国参议院本周有望批准这位56岁的金融家接替杰伊•鲍威尔出任美联储主席。

伊朗战争推高燃气价格,印度工人纷纷逃离城市生活

伊朗战争推高了烹饪燃料价格,迫使印度许多务工人员返乡回村。

能源、军火与粮食:特朗普对伊战争日益沉重的代价

这场冲突正波及整个美国经济,造成了数千亿美元的产出损失。

肺纤维化生物科技公司Avalyn Pharma申请首次公开募股(IPO)

一家生物技术公司正开发可吸入剂型的已获批肺纤维化口服药,计划赴公开市场融资以支持其后期研发。
2天前

凯勒拉治疗学公司在生物技术领域创纪录的IPO中融资6.25亿美元

最新的生物科技公司首次公开募股创下历史新高。
2天前

法国将迎来最拥挤的大选角逐场:谁将取代马克龙?

左翼和中间阵营的分裂,助长了极右翼问鼎爱丽舍宫的希望。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×