EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

AI热潮席卷全美最寂寞之地

一条长约230英里的输电线路规划威胁内华达的荒野,并使猎人和野生动物组织携手抗议。

中国富裕人群绕开新加坡,转向迪拜

随着这座亚洲城邦收紧申请审查,私人银行家和顾问称海湾地区的兴趣上升。

那位想终结“无用会议”诅咒的首席执行官

必和必拓的韩慕睿正在以一种非常规方式应对企业生活中的一个巨大“黑洞”。

从马姆达尼与玛莎•斯图尔特看“氛围转向”

一场选举胜利和一本“政治不正确”的食谱表明,美国人正把直言不讳置于谨言慎行之上。

达拉斯联储官员:贫富差距拉大恐引发美国经济下行

约翰•威廉姆斯表示,美国贫困群体日益严重的问题可能会影响央行是否在下月降息。

汽车运输巨头称:中国车企正赶超欧洲竞争对手

全球最大运营商Wallenius Wilhelmsen物流公司计划通过助力新兴北京品牌出海来提升营收。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×