EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

电商销售额飙升,沃尔玛强势进军纽约市

这家零售商的线上业务蓬勃发展,在实体店被禁止入驻的城市里与亚马逊展开竞争。

海贼王“草帽海盗旗”如何成为Z世代反叛的象征

全球各地的年轻抗议者纷纷以日本动漫《海贼王》中的“草帽海盗旗”为旗帜,投身争取政治变革的斗争。

Lex专栏:TikTok作为购物平台正经历品牌升级

奢侈品市场的下一阶段将与社交媒体平台深度重叠。

Lex专栏:企业可以押注政治人士对沙特的青睐

对企业而言,随政治人士起舞并不容易,但有时确实会带来机会。

“鸿沟正在拉大”:走进特朗普的“K型”经济

在这位美国总统的第二个任期里,富者更富,贫者更贫。

科技集团将1200亿美元AI数据中心债务转至表外

创新的融资模式为大型科技公司筑起“防护墙”,但同时也让华尔街跟着“一荣俱荣,一损俱损”。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×