Lure of cash poses challenges for asset managers - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
商业快报

Lure of cash poses challenges for asset managers

Fund firms under pressure as investors move into low-cost, high-yielding money market funds

An aggressive campaign of interest rate hikes by central banks has left asset managers locked in a battle for client inflows against cash deposits and low-cost money market funds

M&G Investments’ annual bond forum in London earlier this year featured an unusual presence on the stage: a large colourful statue of an elephant. Fixed to it was a piece of paper reading “6.2 per cent”.

It was there as the literal “elephant in the room” — a visual representation of the challenge that fund managers now face: to win a place in a portfolio, they have to beat the rate that a client can earn on ultra-safe short term savings accounts.

An aggressive campaign of interest rate hikes by central banks over almost two years has left asset managers locked in a battle for client inflows against cash deposits and low-cost, low-risk money market funds. While the 6.2 per cent account is no longer available, savings rates above 5 per cent in the US and UK still present a major challenge for fund managers.

“We’re in a different environment now and many of the assumptions of the last 15 years are being thrown out,” said Peter Harrison, chief executive of FTSE 100 asset manager Schroders. “Cash and short-term fixed income are more attractive, structured products are coming back, and income products are more valuable.”

The new regime, industry insiders believe, will mean hefty outflows at fund firms unsuited to a world of higher rates, compounding existing challenges such as higher costs and pressure on fees that are sweeping across the industry. Equity fund managers, already squeezed by years of competition from ultra-low-cost index tracker funds, could be among the losers, insiders say. For fixed income managers the picture is less clear — while they face a higher hurdle from cash, the return they can make from bond yields has improved.

“The return of cash is the biggest theme in asset management right now,” said Stephen Cohen, head of Europe, Middle East and Africa for BlackRock.

“It has put cash and money market funds front and centre with many of our clients, and raised the hurdle rates for what risk assets need to deliver. It used to be that there was no alternative [to risky assets] — but now there is.”

A record $5.76tn now sits in US money market funds, which park buyers’ dollars in safe instruments like short-term government debt, according to data from the Investment Company Institute.

That is welcome news for asset managers with large money market businesses, such as Fidelity, Vanguard and JPMorgan. But it puts pressure on firms whose offerings are not in demand in the new regime. Reduced fee income as a result of falling assets under management is putting cost-to-income ratios — a key measure of investment manager profitability — under pressure, especially for less efficient players.

“If you’re in a mono-asset class that is not of interest, you will struggle to get flows. You need diversification of asset class, client and geographical perspective,” said Andrea Rossi, chief executive of FTSE 100 savings and investment group M&G. While mergers between asset managers have often proven unsuccessful, Rossi said they will become more frequent as firms try to cope with pressure on their fees and tap growth areas.

“I think we will certainly see some of the narrowly focused players finding strategic partners,” said David Hunt, chief executive of PGIM. 

Among those that have been suffering in the new regime is T Rowe Price, a $690bn active equities manager based in Baltimore, Maryland. It has been struggling with large outflows since 2021 and has tried to cut costs over the past year with two rounds of lay-offs.

Assets run by Baillie Gifford’s Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust, many of whose technology holdings have been hit by rising interest rates, have dropped from about £18bn in June 2021 to £12bn as at October this year. Baillie Gifford as a whole shed more than £100bn in assets in 2022, its most recent figures show.

Bond fund managers have also come under pressure, but see some reasons for optimism. Yields on ultra-safe US government bonds and investment grade corporate debt have surged over the past two years as interest rates have risen.

That has proved painful as the value of the bonds they have held has fallen sharply. But it also means they can now earn more income on bonds they buy, although a fall in yields over the past two months has eroded some of that benefit.

“Fixed income has come back as a really investable asset class — the ability to invest in fixed income and make mid single-digits of yield,” says John Graham, president and chief executive officer of CPP Investments, which invests the assets of the Canada Pension Plan. “That hasn’t been available for a very long time.”

Manny Roman, chief executive of the world’s largest bond-focused manager Pimco, thinks the new environment will favour its business. “Fixed income looks really good because it gives you equity returns for one-third of the risk,” he said.

Many asset managers without a large money market business are nevertheless hoping that central banks will win their battle with inflation without triggering a recession and be able to cut borrowing costs next year, avoiding a so-called “higher for longer” rates environment. That hope has grown in recent weeks after below-forecast inflation readings in the US and eurozone. US headline inflation for November released on Tuesday was in line with forecasts.

Some in the industry believe this scenario could finally drive client flows back into riskier assets.

“To the extent that you get a little bit more clarity on a soft [economic] landing and you get some stability from a geopolitical perspective, there’s a ton of money on the sidelines that will be ready to go risk on,” said Meena Flynn, co-head of private wealth management at Goldman Sachs.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

囤积行为加剧伊朗战争引发的经济损害

随着霍尔木兹海峡的对峙进入第三个月,全球各国政府都在艰难应对同一个难题:如何防止囤积者加剧从汽油到注射器等各类产品的短缺。

FT社评:伊朗战争让各国央行进退两难

如果各国央行过早通过加息来遏制通胀压力,可能令本已受创的经济雪上加霜;如但果按兵不动、观望冲突的进展,又可能贻误时机。

反弹的通胀与不耐烦的特朗普:凯文•沃什面临双重压力

美国参议院本周有望批准这位56岁的金融家接替杰伊•鲍威尔出任美联储主席。

伊朗战争推高燃气价格,印度工人纷纷逃离城市生活

伊朗战争推高了烹饪燃料价格,迫使印度许多务工人员返乡回村。

能源、军火与粮食:特朗普对伊战争日益沉重的代价

这场冲突正波及整个美国经济,造成了数千亿美元的产出损失。

肺纤维化生物科技公司Avalyn Pharma申请首次公开募股(IPO)

一家生物技术公司正开发可吸入剂型的已获批肺纤维化口服药,计划赴公开市场融资以支持其后期研发。
2天前
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×