Starmer’s dilemma: America or Europe? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
英国外交

Starmer’s dilemma: America or Europe?

Trump has laid waste to the Atlantic alliance — the Greenland crisis shows what needs to be done
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":6.74,"text":"The writer is an FT contributing editor"}],[{"start":9.870000000000001,"text":"You could touch the relief in Whitehall. Donald Trump’s retreat from his threatened annexation of Greenland spared Britain the economic recession that would have been likely to follow a transatlantic trade war. But there was more. For Sir Keir Starmer’s government, the US about-turn deferred a painful moment of strategic reckoning. Britain has long been America’s best, and most dependent, ally in Europe. A decade ago, the Brexit vote put it outside its neighbours in the EU. It is not going to be easy to turn history on its head."}],[{"start":45.92,"text":"In Paris, policymakers talk about Britain’s Suez question. The British and French agree that, absent the guarantee once provided by the Americans, European security requires partnership between the continent’s two nuclear-armed powers. Germany will boast the largest military, but Britain and France have the global strategic outlook and experience. Then comes “the question”. Will Starmer, the French ask, choose Europe over the US when the stakes really count?"}],[{"start":77.4,"text":"Seventy years have passed since the then prime minister Anthony Eden declared that the Channel was wider than the Atlantic. The 1956 military expedition to take back the Suez Canal from Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser was an Anglo-French affair — the last gasp of two empires in decline. Kept in the dark, Dwight Eisenhower’s US administration reacted with fury. Faced with a run on sterling, Eden buckled. His successor Harold Macmillan bet Britain’s future on the “special relationship”. The memory lives on in Paris."}],[{"start":114.65,"text":"Cross-Channel relations have improved greatly during the past 18 months. Starmer’s Labour government has rebuilt bridges burned by the Conservatives through Brexit. Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine has brought together Britain, France and Germany at the head of a coalition of the willing in support of Kyiv. Diplomats say Starmer, Germany’s Friedrich Merz and France’s Emmanuel Macron have an easy relationship. London has signed a new defence pact with Berlin, and London and Paris are collaborating on nuclear modernisation."}],[{"start":149.13,"text":"For Europe, the Greenland crisis has clarified what needs to be done as Trump lays waste to the Atlantic alliance. There are still holdouts clinging to the idea that the old order can be rescued. And there are renegades, such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, who want to be best pals with both Putin and Trump. But most leaders now agree with Canada’s Mark Carney who, in an eloquent truth-telling exercise in Davos this week, pointed out that nostalgia is not a strategy. There is no going back."}],[{"start":183.60999999999999,"text":"Macron’s calls for European strategic autonomy used to be dismissed in Berlin as an expression of the French anti-Americanism once articulated by Charles de Gaulle. Trump’s vulgar disdain for Europe, voiced again in Davos, has made Gaullism respectable. Merz is among Trump’s most robust critics. Germany has made its choice."}],[{"start":207.08999999999997,"text":"Not yet Starmer. True, Trump’s threat to annex the territory of a Nato partner saw a notable stiffening in the prime minister’s rhetoric. But left unanswered was how far would Britain have gone if the EU had responded to Trump’s tariff threat with trade sanctions. Would the UK have joined the EU in retaliation? It was a decision, British diplomats admit, the government was mightily relieved to be spared."}],[{"start":233.23999999999998,"text":"There are reasons for the reticence. The stakes were spelled out during a Downing Street press conference when Starmer twice alluded to UK reliance on the US to keep its nuclear deterrent operational. The Trident submarine-based missile system may technically be “independent” but the missiles require regular servicing in the US."}],[{"start":255.51999999999998,"text":"Senior officials in the Whitehall security establishment tell the prime minister that unravelling transatlantic defence and intelligence collaboration and breaking with military equipment dependency would take decades. They are right — but all the more reason to set off now. And the US has compelling reasons of its own to avoid a sudden rupture, not least its listening, tracking and air bases in Britain."}],[{"start":281.46,"text":"Trump’s imperial presidency has limits. A forecast setback in America’s midterm elections, you hear the nostalgists say, will impose further constraints. They are daydreaming. The hard truth is that, whatever happens to Trump, the old Atlantic order, rooted in shared values and trust as well as mutual interest, cannot be remade."}],[{"start":304.24,"text":"The EU has not been idle. Defence budgets are rising, Brussels is keeping Ukraine afloat financially with a €90bn loan, and the EU’s new Security Action for Europe programme has set a framework for continent-wide military procurement. For all that, there remains a reluctance in national capitals to add substance to rhetoric if it means weighing collective action against narrow national interests. For France, rebuilding military industrial capacity seems part of Macron’s project only when French manufacturers are in charge. Paris has fallen out with Berlin over plans for a new generation of fighter aircraft and done its best to keep British companies out of the Safe programme."}],[{"start":351.89,"text":"It is left to Starmer, though, to make the biggest leap. Welcome as it has been, re-engagement with the EU has been limited. The government, you hear Britain’s partners say, has not invested serious political capital and is still hedging its bets. It needs to build trust. They have a point. Trump’s volte-face has removed the immediate pressure but this is a stay rather than a reprieve. Britain’s security is inextricably tied to Europe. The Suez question has to be answered. The policy of pretending otherwise has run out of road."}],[{"start":400.76,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1769387895_9056.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

乌克兰军火商加码卫星布局,以减少对美依赖

在开发无人机和导弹之后,Fire Point正进军太空领域,尽管公司仍因涉嫌腐败接受调查。

囤积行为加剧伊朗战争引发的经济损害

随着霍尔木兹海峡的对峙进入第三个月,全球各国政府都在艰难应对同一个难题:如何防止囤积者加剧从汽油到注射器等各类产品的短缺。

FT社评:伊朗战争让各国央行进退两难

如果各国央行过早通过加息来遏制通胀压力,可能令本已受创的经济雪上加霜;如但果按兵不动、观望冲突的进展,又可能贻误时机。

反弹的通胀与不耐烦的特朗普:凯文•沃什面临双重压力

美国参议院本周有望批准这位56岁的金融家接替杰伊•鲍威尔出任美联储主席。

伊朗战争推高燃气价格,印度工人纷纷逃离城市生活

伊朗战争推高了烹饪燃料价格,迫使印度许多务工人员返乡回村。

能源、军火与粮食:特朗普对伊战争日益沉重的代价

这场冲突正波及整个美国经济,造成了数千亿美元的产出损失。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×