EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction

The wheels have not come off the electronic vehicle market entirely

When periods of exuberance come to a close, ideas that once seemed to make a lot of sense no longer do. So it is in the European car industry. Slowing growth of electric vehicle sales has caused a series of corporate U-turns. While sharp swerves are never fun, the change in direction is sensible.

A decision by Volvo Cars on Thursday to cut loose its premium EV brand Polestar is the latest example of a strategic about-turn. Earlier this week, Renault axed plans to float its EV unit Ampere. A mooted initial public offering of Volkswagen’s battery unit, meanwhile, also looks some way off.

The wheels have not come off the EV market entirely. Sales growth in Europe is expected to come in at about 5 per cent in 2024 — a sharp slowdown from 2023’s 14 per cent growth, but hardly a crash. The market had simply overestimated the pace of change.

EU carmakers, traditionally plagued with vast conglomerate discounts, aimed to attract sky high valuations for their EV arms. The hope was to achieve those enjoyed by Tesla, which trades at more than 58 times forward earnings, and Vietnam’s VinFast. Now that the market’s enthusiasm has waned — shares in VinFast are down 85 per cent over the past six months — “unlocking value” through corporate action looks less attractive.   

The strategic rationale for EV listings was always tenuous. Polestar, with sizeable investment needs and operationally reliant on Volvo and its Chinese parent Geely, was not an obvious candidate for a standalone equity story when it listed in 2022. Worse, Volvo retained 48 per cent. With the Swedish carmaker facing big EV-related capex needs of its own, a spin-off that hands Polestar to its ultimate shareholder Geely looks like a better plan. Volvo’s stock rose by about a quarter on Thursday. 

At Renault, too, shareholders welcomed the decision to keep Ampere within the fold. Lex has argued that EVs will be a key pillar of the group’s value creation in future. But given Renault does not need capital to fund its transition, it is right to hold on to Ampere for the time being.

The slowing pace of EV adoption is good news for traditional European automakers, which have been slow to transition. Stellantis, which has taken a particularly cautious approach, has outperformed Tesla in the past 12 months. If the EV revolution takes longer to materialise legacy automakers should have more time to align themselves with their EV-focused peers.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

厌倦火车晚点的德国人开始模拟下注

德国铁路公司创下历史新低的准点率,已经引发了段子、T恤,如今甚至还催生了一款模拟博彩平台。

银行面临三重新威胁:伊朗、AI与私募信贷

更大的隐忧将持续笼罩欧洲银行股。
33分钟前

FT社评:另一场霍尔木兹海峡冲击

受扰动的大宗商品远不止石油和天然气,这将带来持久影响。

从温泉到米饼:海湾能源危机重创日本小企业

对进口燃料的依赖正在扼住全球第五大经济体的喉咙,暴露了作为其经济核心的小企业的脆弱性。

软银追加300亿美元OpenAI投资,考验自身借贷上限

孙正义将巨额资金投入人工智能领域,需要面对投资者的不安情绪。

特朗普能否与伊朗达成协议?

任何结束战争的外交努力都面临重重障碍。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×