The risk of a replay of the lost decade in US stocks - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
美国股市

The risk of a replay of the lost decade in US stocks

The misallocation of capital in the economy will fuel inflation
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":9.43,"text":"The writer is chief executive and chief investment officer of Richard Bernstein Advisors "}],[{"start":14.629999999999999,"text":"No economic model would have predicted stocks would be at all-time highs and credit spreads would be very narrow after the Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate by 5.25 percentage points since early 2022. "},{"start":26.546999999999997,"text":"Yet, that is exactly what has happened. "}],[{"start":29.919999999999998,"text":"The Fed seems ready to declare victory in its fight against inflation, but the outperformance of highly speculative investments suggests that even such a sharp increase in interest rates hasn’t been a big enough mop to soak up the excess liquidity sloshing around the financial markets. "}],[{"start":44.449999999999996,"text":"Central banks still don’t seem to understand that financial bubbles are sources of future real asset inflation. "},{"start":50.303999999999995,"text":"Bubbles misallocate capital within an economy to unneeded assets (cryptocurrencies and meme stocks, perhaps? "},{"start":56.65899999999999,"text":"And capital doesn’t flow to productivity-enhancing investment. "},{"start":60.06399999999999,"text":"Indeed, the US consumer price index finally peaked at 5.6 per cent subsequent to the technology bubble in 2008. "}],[{"start":68.47999999999999,"text":"There is evidence that speculation could again be curtailing the Fed’s inflation-fighting power, but the central bank seems blind to this. "},{"start":75.672,"text":"Investors shouldn’t be. "}],[{"start":77.71,"text":"Historically, the performance of higher and lower quality has been consistent across asset classes. "},{"start":83.314,"text":"Smaller capitalisation stocks’ relative performance versus larger stocks tends to mimic credit spreads — the interest rate corporates pay over benchmark levels. "},{"start":91.64399999999999,"text":"That is because smaller, lower-quality companies have greater operating and financial leverage and are more influenced by the economic and profit cycles. "}],[{"start":100.25,"text":"In other words, small cap stocks tend to outperform large caps and credit spreads tighten when corporate profits improve, but large caps tend to outperform and credit spreads widen when profits deteriorate. "}],[{"start":111.64,"text":"Speculation over the past two years has significantly distorted this long-standing inter-market quality relationship. "},{"start":117.807,"text":"Large cap stocks have outperformed small cap stocks despite profits accelerating and credit spreads tightening. "},{"start":123.724,"text":"This has been primarily driven by the so-called Magnificent Seven tech stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia and Tesla. "},{"start":133.442,"text":"The result has been a narrow market leadership and an emphasis on higher-quality stocks. "},{"start":137.934,"text":"Fixed-income performance, however, has been broader, and more cyclical with lower-quality credit benefiting. "}],[{"start":144.65,"text":"This extreme divergence suggests three possible outcomes. "},{"start":148.267,"text":"First, the Magnificent Seven’s outperformance might be ignoring the broad improvement in corporate cash flows, whereas narrow credit spreads are correctly accounting for the cyclical upturn. "},{"start":157.734,"text":"This seems reasonable because the US profits cycle is accelerating and roughly 160 S&P 500 companies now have earnings growth of 25 per cent or more. "}],[{"start":167.96,"text":"A second scenario could be that the equity market’s extremely narrow leadership is justified because an apocalyptic credit event is lurking. "},{"start":175.227,"text":"Goldman Sachs has pointed out the 1930s was the last time equity market leadership was as narrow as it is today. "}],[{"start":182.39000000000001,"text":"Narrow leadership makes economic sense during a depression because companies are struggling to survive let alone grow. "},{"start":188.58200000000002,"text":"Today’s narrow leadership, however, is accompanied by accelerating corporate earnings and a healthy banking system. "},{"start":194.72400000000002,"text":"Thus, a significant credit event of the magnitude that would justify such narrow equity market leadership seems unlikely. "}],[{"start":202.25,"text":"A third scenario could be that excess liquidity is fuelling speculation in both the equity and the fixed-income markets, and that neither the Magnificent Seven’s outperformance nor the tight credit spreads are appropriate. "},{"start":212.867,"text":"There’s certainly evidence of speculation in both markets. "},{"start":215.922,"text":"If this scenario is the appropriate interpretation, then equity market segments not typically defensive, such as emerging markets and smaller caps, might prove to be havens should the volatility of the current stock market leaders increase. "}],[{"start":228.92000000000002,"text":"Although odd, there is a precedent for this. "},{"start":231.72400000000002,"text":"When the technology bubble began to deflate in March 2000, the overall stock market began the “lost decade” during which the S&P 500 had a modest negative annualised return for 10 years, but energy stocks, commodities, emerging markets, and smaller caps performed extremely well. "}],[{"start":248.75,"text":"From March 2000 to March 2010, the S&P 500’s annualised total return was negative 0.7 per cent a year and the S&P 500 Technology sector was down 8.0 per cent a year. "},{"start":260.804,"text":"However, the S&P 500 Energy sector was up 9.4 per cent a year, the S&P Small Cap Index was up 6.6 per cent a year, and MSCI Emerging Market Index was up 10.0 per cent a year. "}],[{"start":274.61,"text":"Those segments benefited from the reallocation of capital away from technology stocks, but also from post-bubble inflation spurring their profits. "},{"start":282.327,"text":"The Fed’s past could be the prologue. "},{"start":284.53200000000004,"text":"Capital is again being misallocated within the economy, yet the Fed still doesn’t seem to appreciate that misallocated capital kindles future inflation. "}],[{"start":292.6,"text":""}]],"url":"https://creatives.ftacademy.cn/album/161550-1720000615.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

相关话题

特朗普的阿拉斯加州液化天然气项目未能打动亚洲盟友

日本和韩国抵制美国压力,拒绝将对管道项目的承诺纳入贸易协议。

FT社评:Meta高薪争夺AI人才暗藏隐忧

无论是足球还是股票分析,明星太多都让团队运作变得困难。

乌克兰无人机袭击致索契俄罗斯油库起火

弗拉基米尔•泽连斯基对黑海设施遭远程打击表示欢迎,目前无人机和导弹的交火仍在持续。

我们不能把全球贸易的所有混乱都归咎于特朗普

世界贸易组织的许多体制和程序已经失灵,我们应当承认这一失败。

欧佩克+将石油产量配额上调至两年来最高水平

分析师预测,在该卡特尔取消减产后,原油将在今年年底前出现供应过剩。

中国出口会继续无视特朗普的贸易战吗?

我们可以预期英格兰银行利率制定者会释放哪些信号?美股还能继续上涨吗?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×